
https://www.cartoonbrew.com/tv/cartoon- ... 58449.html
I thought it was okay at the very least - in it's first season. I remember being impressed by some aspects of it like some degree of continuity and not using the Sword of Omens as some kind of a cheap deus ex machina. The second season in the other hand was just one great steaming pile of feces.Skyquake87 wrote:Looks a bit like a cross between Teen Titans Go! and The Powerpuff Girls. Not bad. I'd be willing to give it a watch, see what it's like. I tried rewatching the '80s cartoon, back when the DVDs came out and yeah...its aged, man. Time to move on (theme tune is still ace though).
Yeah; and the thing is if it takes off there'll be a chance of some trickle-down for the TC equivalent of the Geewuners, just like there has been from the Bay films or those dippy films with the same names as the Marvel characters. Certainly more than they're getting now, which is nothing.Brendocon 2.0 wrote:If people want Thundercats to be an ongoing thing, this is what it needs to do.
Eagerly awaiting a Firestick to catch up on the show.Denyer wrote:Young Justice getting a third season has promise -- S2 was rather grim and too bound up in overall arc but hopefully it'll get back to the heights of S1.
I feel the topknot is doing sterling duty as a lightning rod.This Roar thing might be fun taken as a fan-made YouTube deal -- presented in those terms it'd be viewed more charitably. The intro vid did manage to convey enough enthusiasm that you might be convinced not to herd the creators and that guy's topknot into the sea.
YouTube. That's the problem. People watch the title sequences and 'remember' all these shows as balls-to-the-wall action-adventure with spiffing animation, rather than 22 minutes of telegraphed moral lessons with the child association characters Learning A Lesson with a perfunctory inconclusive scrap tacked on the end. Honestly, it should be some law that if you claim Thundercats/Transformers/MOTU/GhostBusters etc. were classic shows on the internet you then have to sit down and watch them.(even with plenty of people who remember the cartoon being better than it was).
No kidding.Skyquake87 wrote:Besides which, your childhood heroes are still there - immortalized in plastic, shiny discs and other ephemera.
...i hate the the world is getting like this and the film Idiocracy is slowly becoming reality
I think XKCD had a comic taking a shit on people making that claim, too.Skyquake87 wrote:...i hate the the world is getting like this and the film Idiocracy is slowly becoming reality
Went on for ages over here, plus supported a comic that wasn't quite up there with Transformers or MOTU but had a bunch of specials and annuals tacked on.Warcry wrote:I have to admit that I don't understand why companies continue to try to revive flash in the pan franchises like Thundercats at all, though. Stuff like Transformers or TMNT or G.I. Joe or Power Rangers that have decades of success behind them, sure. But Thundercats was moderately popular for around two years,
Warcry wrote:Just like with Hasbro trying to push Jem or Rom or MASK or whatever...did anyone actually ask for this?
Less so here, or perhaps I was just too young to feel the brunt of it? I had a few of the toys and enjoyed the show when I was a kid, but I don't remember any of my friends or the other kids at school being into it. And by the time I was old enough to start remembering what was in stores, I don't remember ever seeing much Thundercats stuff. Whereas I could buy He-Man stuff well into the 90s, even though it was probably old stock.Denyer wrote:Went on for ages over here, plus supported a comic that wasn't quite up there with Transformers or MOTU but had a bunch of specials and annuals tacked on.
I think you're right that there's definitely a difference between a "revival" and just the newest iteration of something that's been around forever. Some franchises have lasting appeal and others are really a product of their time. How do you sell, say, G.I. Joe in a world where global opinion of the US army is at a historically low tide and real-life terrorists are in the news practically every day? Robots that turn into cars is a concept that gives you way, way more freedom to reinvent yourself for new audiences.Cliffjumper wrote:The thing is it seems very rare for these revivals to really take off. Transformers and MLP seem to be the only ones (and they, like Power Rangers or superheroes or Barbie, have more never really stopped anyway, just having the odd spell in the sun). The big hits of recent years - Frozen, Paw Patrol, PJ Masks, Shopkins, Pixar films - have all been new properties.
I think you're right on that. And hey, maybe they will. But I don't think that it being Thundercats makes that any more or less likely than if it was a completely different property with substantially the same scripts attached to a totally new franchise.Cliffjumper wrote:I wonder if it's an extension of Transformers' official output being packed with fanboys - whoever owns the rights or whatever is now being ran by some guy who loved Thundercats as a kid and is determined that kids today will love it.
Warcry wrote:Just like with Hasbro trying to push Jem or Rom or MASK or whatever...did anyone actually ask for this?