Post
by Rossum » Tue Apr 15, 2008 6:48 pm
OK, I can see your points, especially about Devastation being a big jumble; though I wonder how much of that was a result of sudden changes in response to reader complaints. Likewise with the constant promises of payoff that never quite come about - it does seem like Furman was writing one story, (a slow, universe-building, serious sci-fi thing), and hyping another (excitement, death and explosions!).
All the same, I think I like the setup of the universe so much that I'm willing to forgive the flaws in storytelling (some of the dialogue does kill me though). The nature of the war, the Transformers' personalities, even the way the humans act - it's all interesting, semi-realistic, and doesn't entirely talk down to the reader. The difference is really noticable when I look at the AHM preview (to marginally bring this back on topic) - there, we have humans acting very comic-booky (a city crowd wouldn't react to giant robots with immediate delight, regardless of whether they know what they are or not), and the Transformers acting very cartoony. The story we get in AHM may be straightforward, with self-contained stories in each issue, but if it feels like it's written for kids, I'm not really going to care.
I do wish Devastation had played out somewhat like Terome suggested, and probably having some consequence like Ironhide dying would have helped keep the more mature promise of the series. Still I think the main series plus the Spotlights have provided a good take on Transformers overall.