He-man vs She-ra
The Sword of Omens got beat by Excalibur. Excalibur impaled the Eye of Thundara and killed all the Thundercats.
Now the Power Sword is more powerful than Excalibur, so it should be able to beat the Sword of Omens in the same way.
Excalibur is basically like the Sword of the Ancients in the Filmation episode "Masks of Power." And in that episode the Sorceress states, "Next to your Sword, the Sword of the Ancients is the most powerful weapon on Eternia."
Now the Power Sword is more powerful than Excalibur, so it should be able to beat the Sword of Omens in the same way.
Excalibur is basically like the Sword of the Ancients in the Filmation episode "Masks of Power." And in that episode the Sorceress states, "Next to your Sword, the Sword of the Ancients is the most powerful weapon on Eternia."
It seems like He-man's Power Sword is the only sword that has proven to be indestructible.
The Stone in She-ra's Sword of Protection was able to be cracked, rendering it impotent.
Lionel's Sword of Omens: the blade has been broken and the Eye of Thundara in its hilt has been de-powered, impaled by Excalibur.
Even the blade of Excalibur has been broken, in the movie.
The Sword of Power has never been broken. It does not have the weak spot of a gem. And the Power Sword has been thrown in the foundry to try to melt it down, with no effect.
Does this mean He-man's Sword of Power is simply the best, better than all the rest, because it's simpler and has a simple design?
Is plainer, simpler better when it comes to sword design? Does introducing complexity (e.g. a gem or jewel) or an added feature (e.g. making the sword extendible and retractable) make the sword weaker or more vulnerable?
The Stone in She-ra's Sword of Protection was able to be cracked, rendering it impotent.
Lionel's Sword of Omens: the blade has been broken and the Eye of Thundara in its hilt has been de-powered, impaled by Excalibur.
Even the blade of Excalibur has been broken, in the movie.
The Sword of Power has never been broken. It does not have the weak spot of a gem. And the Power Sword has been thrown in the foundry to try to melt it down, with no effect.
Does this mean He-man's Sword of Power is simply the best, better than all the rest, because it's simpler and has a simple design?
Is plainer, simpler better when it comes to sword design? Does introducing complexity (e.g. a gem or jewel) or an added feature (e.g. making the sword extendible and retractable) make the sword weaker or more vulnerable?