Animated Lockdown

another tf fan · Post by **another tf fan** » Fri Mar 14, 2008 8:49 pm

Sorry to mention another site here, but Siebertron has a gallery of animated Lockdown.

I noticed a few things....

First of all the bio says Lockdown :"... could care less ..." ...ugh that bugs me so much. The proper phrase is "Could Not Care Less"

Second; MAN THAT IS A HUGE DELUXE FIGURE. he's taller than voyager movie megs and voyager Bulkhead.

A very nice toy that poses as well as classics mirage. Cool accesories and a great alt mode. I'LL GET TWO!

Post by **Clay** » Fri Mar 14, 2008 8:55 pm

another tf fan wrote:First of all the bio says Lockdown :"... could care less ..." ...ugh that bugs me so much. The proper phrase is "Could Not Care Less"

We've also had a review for Lockdown sitting the forum for months now. I haven't uploaded it since we haven't put up a menu for Animated in the toy section yet: there's no where for it go at the moment.

Notabot · Post by **Notabot** » Sat Mar 15, 2008 4:28 am

Maybe they mean he's actually a very sensitive, nurturing Decepticon, so it would behoove him to care a little bit less. "You know, Lockdown. You could care less. We wouldn't think less of you for it."

Post by **Clay** » Sat Mar 15, 2008 4:54 am

I find this chart explains the verbal blunder nicely:

RID Scourge · Post by **RID Scourge** » Sat Mar 15, 2008 5:50 am

More importantly would be to ask when the animated figures were released, and is Jazz among them?

EDIT: Nevermind. Just realized that Nev's is probably on top of that checklist, and there it was. Doesn't look like an anticipated date is announced for Jazz.

another tf fan · Post by **another tf fan** » Sun Mar 16, 2008 1:13 am

thanks clay, the chart is very usefull.

Post by **Denyer** » Sun Mar 16, 2008 1:25 am

Clay wrote: we haven't put up a menu for Animated in the toy section yet: there's no where for it go at the moment.

Whoops.

It's worth poking me about things like this, 'cause it's quick enough to do.

We gonna put Classics 2.0/Universe stuff in with the existing Classics?

edit: done.

Remind me to split the KO reviews into a separate section.

Post by **Clay** » Sun Mar 16, 2008 1:35 am

Denyer wrote:Whoops.

It's worth poking me about things like this...

We gonna put Classics 2.0 stuff in with the existing Classics?

I remember mentioning it before, but your head was full of snot at the time...

As far as I'm concerned, there's no reason not to put the new classics with the old.

Post by **Clay** » Sun Mar 16, 2008 2:03 am

review's up