Spider-Man: 3 Days, $114 Million

*Predaking* · Post by ***Predaking*** » Sun May 05, 2002 6:56 pm

It's not an official figure but I am sure the final fig will be very close. check out here.

Starscreamsghost · Post by **Starscreamsghost** » Sun May 05, 2002 7:00 pm

And written by one of the more pathetic screenwriters of our time, who's pumped out such refuse as "The Lost World: Jurassic Park" and "Snake Eyes"...haven't seen SpiderMan yet, but here's hoping it was not nearly as poorly written as his past endeavors...

Galvatron91 · Post by **Galvatron91** » Sun May 05, 2002 7:09 pm

casper, if you like comics, you will enjoy this movie!

The Green Knight · Post by **The Green Knight** » Sun May 05, 2002 7:14 pm

I don't intend to see it, but I hope it whoops Titanic's ass brutally.

cosmotron · Post by **cosmotron** » Sun May 05, 2002 7:14 pm

Originally posted by Starscreamsghost
And written by one of the more pathetic screenwriters of our time, who's pumped out such refuse as "The Lost World: Jurassic Park" and "Snake Eyes"...haven't seen SpiderMan yet, but here's hoping it was not nearly as poorly written as his past endeavors...

so why would they get that guy to write the movie?
anyways a quick question, was everyone pleased with the choice of kirsten dunst as mary jane.
i men she has a great body but i don like her face.
i thought they should hv gotten soemone else

Starscreamsghost · Post by **Starscreamsghost** » Sun May 05, 2002 7:15 pm

I do, Galvy, so I suppose I'll have to get off my rump and go see it. Never did read the SpiderMan comics, but my friend is a maniac for 'em and said that it's a pretty smooth transition.

Galvatron91 · Post by **Galvatron91** » Sun May 05, 2002 7:17 pm

the transition was done quite well, incorporated some elements in the cartoon as well. All in all, it was very true to spidey form and the web head's conversion to the big screen i believe made it the finest comic movie ever made.

Redstreak · Post by **Redstreak** » Sun May 05, 2002 7:27 pm

Originally posted by Snake
I don't intend to see it, but I hope it whoops Titanic's ass brutally.

Seems more likely that Episode 2 will do that...(it's supposed to rule quite awesomely from what I've seen and heard)

Least I hope so!

Plasmodium · Post by **Plasmodium** » Sun May 05, 2002 7:31 pm

It doesnt matter what sinks the Titanic (the irony) as long as the job gets done.

*Predaking* · Post by ***Predaking*** » Sun May 05, 2002 7:39 pm

I seriously doubt Episode 2 can smash Spidey's box office record. The sequel hasn't generated the type of hype that Ep 1 enjoyed. I think Kristen Dunst is hot as heck and she's definitely a good fit as Mary Jane. MJ always got a round face and great bod and KD's got both.

Sixswitch · Post by **Sixswitch** » Mon May 06, 2002 4:04 am

Originally posted by Plasmodium
It doesnt matter what sinks the Titanic (the irony) as long as the job gets done.

He's right, you know...

Blitzwing · Post by **Blitzwing** » Mon May 06, 2002 4:36 am

Originally posted by cosmotron

anyways a quick question, was everyone pleased with the choice of kirsten dunst as mary jane.
i men she has a great body but i don like her face.
i thought they should hv gotten soemone else

I'm going off topic here, but personally I would just like to say that I'm getting fed up with all these girls that have to look absolutely perfect. For once they should make a movie that features a leading lady that doesn't have to be perfect, because there are no perfect looking girls in the real world. Face it, Britney Spears, Cameron Diaz, or whoever you think is the prettiest face in Hollywood is only attractive because of makeup and/or plastic surgeory. I'd prefer to see a normal girl in a film than a fake one.

Galvatron91 · Post by **Galvatron91** » Mon May 06, 2002 5:19 am

Dunst is an absolute babe! I'm so sick of that garbage too..."she's too this...she's too that...they should get someone else to do that." Would you please shut the hell up! Kirsten Dunst is one of the most extraordinary women i have ever feasted my eyes upon. Her casting as Mary Jane was perfect...and when she called him tiger (just like the comics) i found myself so wishing i could get bitten by one of them spiders...

Jetfire · Post by **Jetfire** » Mon May 06, 2002 8:47 am

Kirstin Dinst is a far better actress than most f thpse 'petty face's' that dominate hollywood. She is also very actractive too even if not to the universal taste's.

I am looking forward to the movie now. So glad they kept it close to the comic comcept. Comic movie's allwayts work better that way.

mkay0 · Post by **mkay0** » Mon May 06, 2002 9:27 am

star wars episode II will make less money than spider man this summer. that is all.

Originally posted by Starscreamsghost
And written by one of the more pathetic screenwriters of our time

koepp's dumbass CO-wrote the movie, along with five other guys. seeing as the movie tries to stay true to the comic, who cares who wrote it? nothing to worry about ghosty.

TFARCHIVE FORUMS

Spider-Man: 3 Days, $114 Million

Spider-Man: 3 Days, $114 Million

amen to brother blitzwing!